Showing posts with label every. Show all posts
Showing posts with label every. Show all posts

Monday, May 9, 2011

Leadership Development is Coming of Age and Returning to Each and Every Individual


Leadership development can be read in any business, educational or professional organizational journal. Leadership continues to be a popular topic. However, with thousands of articles, hundreds of books, the question for me is "Why?"

With all this information, why are we still not developing the leaders necessary for the 21st century? Maybe, because the focus is on the competencies (knowledge and skills) and fails to acknowledge that each individual brings to the table of life certain key strengths. When a competency-based model for leadership is implemented, this approach ignores the wealth of inherent strengths that reside within each individual and can be developed into incredible leadership skills.

Also, leadership skills are not just relegated to the executive team or upper management, but should cascade down throughout the organization and positively develop each and every stakeholder.

So, then what is the definition of leadership? Peter Drucker has stated that "leadership is all about results." Drucker's definition is only part of what leadership means. By achieving results forward progress is made and those involved feel that their efforts have been justified.

Leading without securing either business results or personal results is much like walking the same path over and over again. This may be an easy path to travel, but ultimately diminishes the incredible potential residing within all individuals and decreases the overall results within the organization. Also, this approach reinforces a fear of accountability. By not having the desired results clearly articulated and shared, everyone denies accountability and embraces a victim mentality by pointing their fingers at other shareholders.

Another part of leadership, missing from Drucker's definition, is that core values must always be demonstrated when achieving the desired results. Failure to include those non-negotiable behaviors within the overall definition of leadership supports a culture contrary to the desired results.

Today's media has the ability to almost immediately broadcast the unethical behaviors of corporate CEOs to elected government officials. These individuals, in many cases, are viewed as leaders within the communities because they were able to secure significant results. However, because they sacrificed their values or in some cases there were no core values present, these individuals are truly not the leaders necessary to take a school corporation, an organization, a state or a country forward in the 21st century.

Also, leadership begins with the individual. Leadership is about individuals achieving results. Drucker's and others' definitions may imply that leadership begins from within each individual, but the definition of leadership must clearly state the source of leadership.

Finally, leadership is truly about achieving the desired results. The use of the word desired indicates that there exists some planning, strategy and higher order thinking skills involved. Results are not achieved willy-nilly or haphazardly, but rather with careful and thoughtful consideration.

If we accept the definition of leadership as being individuals who consistently deliver the desired results while executing positive core values, our belief of leadership may change. No longer do we confuse leadership with management, that leadership is only for the administrative team or that leadership for management is different than leadership for the rest of the those within the organization. Nor we will accept any results, but rather results that can be directly tied to specific strategies and tactics. Now, we can begin to look at the strengths of each individual and how those strengths can be further developed and leveraged to create a win-win for everyone.

The next question is how do we leverage the strengths of each individual to help them become better leaders who can consistently achieve the desired results without the sacrifice of positive and critical core values? That is a very good question and the answer may be far simpler than many realize.

In any organization, management needs to model the leadership behaviors that they are expecting from each other as well as everyone else. The disconnect between "Do as I say and not as I do" rings even more false today than 40 years ago. Today's work force can see the disconnects and more importantly will challenge those very same issues. Their challenges can be direct, but are usually indirect through many of their miss-behaviors including "jumping ship."

Leadership development is coming of age and more and more individuals are recognizing that leadership requires a shared definition as well as total alignment within the organization. Failure to embrace this realization will create a rudderless ship traveling thousands of miles in a continual circle while wasting the individual potential of each crew member.








Leanne Hoagland-Smith, M.S. is a business coach and executive coach with offices in Indianapolis and near Chicago. She writes, speaks and coaches people in businesses to quickly double or triple results through the creation of an executable strategic plan along with the necessary leadership skills "to pull it off."

One quick question,Of you could develop accountable employees who consistently demonstrate exceptional leadership skills, what would that mean to you? Then, take a risk and give me, Leanne, a call at 219.759.5601 for a free telephone consultation.

Visit http://www.processspecialist.com/ and explore everything from free articles to connecting with Leanne.


Friday, October 8, 2010

Use the f.a. to get anybody to do what you want at any time, every time posted by: Gabriel Angelo

In my last article I talked about ?the pickup artist Loophole? and describe to the system date, friendly assertiveness.


Now I?m that so you can develop on it do almost everyone what you want to ask friendly by friendly assertive I like to call it, instead of dominant aggressive.

Example:

If a foreign You? questions

(A.) in a dominant aggressive way ?Give me water! ?

or

(B)?Could, you give me water please?? in some friendly yet assertive

(Or heck even ?Could you please go across the room to get me a water? ?)

You are to ?which rather Note If to choose?

Probably threatened because you feel Didn?t aggressive choice B about losing dominance in choice A; Besides It?s hard someone who is friendly or otherwise it would be rude as a @ $ $ hole are perceived and people around you would also rude to reciprocate and avoid A, with disregard while in choice and that would respond you dominantly aggressive in trying to push ok would you.

There is never something wrong with friendly sein.In friendly case with you, she want you got finally what the water is.

Here?s another example from my life:

I was once behind the bar work, and there were 2 bartender which I had to do.

One of you had a way of communicating that truly was aggressive,

?Bring me over the bottle!?

I Didn?t care if he 10 years bartending throughout Europe since was, and he was the best, I was getting like ?Who the hell do you think you are??

The second bartender was friendly assertive, dominant under the radar, I like it, to describe

?Hey such as bring me the bottle??

The second bartender wanted me to do something but at the same time still I felt in the control, so I was rather with the request erfüllen.Der second bartender might even wonder me, take the garbage in the basement dumpster and then bring back a case of lemon juice and I to the more than the other bartenders met him although it more work required.

Weird, isn?t it?

You can call these aggressive behaviors, but natural human behaviour may be said, what to do, especially feel taken advantage.

What I like is to say, to the result control by you think and feel, will be in the control.

Many of the great natural leaders have this quality of quiet friendly drive is, how to get people to follow you, not the arrogant aggressiveness must feel dominant as a Dictator?as, ago nobody as said, I said to what to do and be claimed.

And combine that with friendly assertive and value what you lack.

If friendly connect ability combined with value to give to others what they lack, makes you feel prove to magnetically people come into your life and you Don?t have something to do.

By: Gabriel AngeloArticle directory: http://www.articledashboard.comGabriel Angelo is the author of "The art of social natural," the first of its kind book dealing with the social art not only too well with women, but building one cool Entourage with jeder.Die art taught not only entrusted, picking up women and dating - but the overall arching overall picture of the social dynamics, where he believes that this seduction community be www.socialnatural.com or www.socialnatural.com/blog heading muss.Besuchen ask you for more information. Supplementary items home | self improvement | leadership

View the original article here

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Call - you build it every day posted by: Servantleader

During my youth, my father (a 20-year air force veteran) used to say born ?You with only a surname are, you have to work hard to protect your Reputation?. This was to remember the good advice. The same goes with your professional reputation.


Building and maintaining your reputation can be one of the hardest tasks ever take you in attack. Why? Because every day is your reputation, it is not only a static event. Furthermore, consistent execution is a day in and day out basis for each task a challenge.Only a few are so important how your Ruf.Es is important to realize that your reputation is what others you believe what you believe about themselves.

Almost everyone knows the high profile visibility around the slopes of Robert Moffat, former SVP of IBM and Mark Hurd, ex-CEO of Hewlett Packard.Everyone had the reputation of being squeaky clean, treuesten and two of the most effective leaders at a Fortune 50 Unternehmen.Beide lost their jobs in disgrace. Hubris and poor judgment effectively ended her public career.

Hats, let you spoil a proud Act or even a lifetime of building ruin your reputation, currently a litmus test appear no matter how harmless kann.Als if you are not ready, your mother who read about it have on the cover of the Wall Street Journal, are likely to risk of the exercise bad judgment.People and companies have long memories.The advent of technology and social media can be increased awareness of a bad decision easy.

A good reputation can higher purpose in life, personally and reputation attracts positive attention professionell.Ein, and you can inspire others too well to machen.Nie a reputation can be purchased; it can only earned werden.Eine person with a reputation must not care what others, about you think speak for their deeds louder than words.
Go and do something good for yourself and others today.

By: ServantleaderArticle directory: http://www.articledashboard.comWayne Rampey is Vice President of InSource group, an IT recruiting and staffing agency in Dallas, TX. contact info: 972.881. 1313. Supplementary items home | self improvement | leadership

View the original article here